The New York Yankees effectively banned
Reggie Jackson from the team after his inflammatory comments about Alex
Rodriguez and other performance-enhancing drug users. While I’m sure that the ultimate
decision was made by Hal Steinbrenner or one of his top deputies, I can’t help
but wonder how much, if anything, ARod had do with Jackson’s banishment.
Right now, ARod has a lot more pull with
the Yankees than Jackson, despite his Hall of Fame pedigree, simply because
ARod is a current player. Regardless of the regrets the Steinbrenners must have
over the expensive, long-term deal they gave him, they have to do everything in
their power to make sure ARod is happy and comfortable, so he can be as
productive a player as possible. And that means not allowing Jackson anywhere
near the Yankees third baseman.
Did ARod tell someone in the Yankees
hierarchy that he didn’t want Reggie around for a while? Maybe, maybe not. I wouldn’t
put it past ARod to say something like that. But it seems more likely that the
Yankees benched Reggie just for starting an unnecessary controversy that they
were forced to deal with, one that took some attention away from the team’s
terrific play heading into the All-Star break.
If someone in the Yankees hierarchy made
the unilateral decision to ban Jackson, was it an overreaction on his or her
part? I don’t think so. It was probably a wise move if for no other reason than
to avoid any incredibly awkward encounters between ARod and Jackson that would
keep the story alive.
But I doubt Jackson’s banishment will
last very long. I would expect to see Mr. October back in the Bronx in October.
But until then, Reggie should keep a very low profile to get back into the
Yankees’ good graces.
No comments:
Post a Comment